Right from the beginning, being a firm leader proved to be my toughest challenge.
According to one Squadron Commander, Shannon Smith, the best leaders focus on the mission. The follower decides when and how the leader will be involved.
Only then, did I decide to reevaluate my leadership style. I accomplished this by micro managing, stating my opinions and wishes, and issuing orders with too much force. It was epic; he worked hard, led with common sense, but his empty rhetoric failed to stimulate any of his directors to reciprocate.
The Book of Acts portrays the spread of the gospel and the growth of the church as the work of the Holy Spirit, and the Gospel of John reminds us that the wind of God blows where it wills.
Numerous field grade officers would go through the motion of communicating with the boss, knowing full well his interests lie in other lines of operation. This step allows the members of the squadron to what they do best…the mission.
Putting the mission first, then your people, and only then yourself will help ensure mission success, a high degree of morale for your troops, and in return guarantee your place as a leader.
I inadvertently alienated others and made myself unapproachable to both my peers and subordinates.
This is the difficult, yet delicate balance a commander must achieve. People that work for you will make mistakes, will make bad decisions, and may not always meet your expectations. My professional demeanor I projected was of a Model Marine, "with no heart.
In flight training this means looking over any relevant part of the aircraft before doing something that could help or hurt the situation if not known first.
What I discovered was my style of firm leadership was sound; however, my execution was less than perfect. To have good communication, the lines of communication need to be open and flow in all directions and must also be seen within the context of the observation to get a full appreciation of the true nature of the communication.
Preserving the family, force, and mission allows me the greatest opportunity to achieve success for my unit and my chain of command.
Integrity is a fundamental character trait for everyone. Dewitt, he revealed my weakness as a leader. Numerous acts of poor leadership eventually severed what little mutual trust existed.
In the third part, I analyze this interview and discuss how it influences my personal philosophy. Set the expectations, Set the policies, and Set the example. Did you hear that work could be exciting and meaningful, or drudgery to be carried out. He had my undivided attention, and I followed his order without hesitation.
Fremont from his command of the Department of the West because he lost the confidence of the men near him. Less than a year ago, my supervisor and his peers stopped trusting their commander.
Therefore as a commander, I am responsible and accountable for actions taken by my subordinates, especially if I have not given them the training and tools required to know the mission. As I will explain further, my leadership philosophy emerges from several sources. His answer, he said, was always the same, "What you don't realize is that when you're the boss, you work for everybody.
Then, he could move to areas that covered accomplishments, leadership, and teamwork.
For we are Warrior Airmen, and we must be prepared to work long hours, go TDY, and ultimately deploy to wherever our nation calls us. The following pages will address my own leadership philosophy, summarize a leadership interview I had with a military squadron commander, and then analyze that interview within the context of my own leadership philosophy.
And leadership can be a powerful tool for good—whether leading a team or developing your individual potential to achieve your personal best. Let us help you chart a course to a deeper sense of purpose and mission to serve.
Aug 03, · Applied Leadership Philosophy Examples. I have developed my own leadership philosophy: People: aligned with purpose – connected by integrity.
This credo organizes my thoughts on what a leader should strive to influence and how I aspire to lead. Inherent in this motto is a requirement to balance mission accomplishment with.
A significant part of effective leadership is the close connection between the leader and the follower, which often determines the success of the leader's mission 4 / My Leadership Credo "Mission Accomplishment". Leadership Credo.
Power, control, speed, accuracy; infantry and aviation, each one is an example of powerful productive tools that the Marine Corps utilizes on a daily bases.
This is why, a proper balance of the two leadership styles is the most effective way for mission accomplishment and more importantly, lead our Marines. If a leader. Alex Gorsky’s Leadership Qualities 1) Mission driven He speaks the words “credo” and “mission” frequently enough, that Gorsky should probably be cited next to their definitions in the dictionary.
I will take ownership of my own success and will work through my failures. I expect the same of others to whom I have entrusted responsibility through appointment, assignment or delegation.My leadership credo mission accomplishment